Matchers expected recorded

2020-01-21 18:03

Dec 10, 2011 The code2 perfectly works fine because both the parameters for the method of the mocked object are matchers. The code3 would throw the 2 matchers expected, 1 recorded because one parameter is a fixed value and the other is a matcher.The N matchers expected, M recorded Problem in EasyMock Posted by: Scott Leberknight on September 30, 2008 EasyMock is a Java dynamic mocking framework that allows you to record expected behavior of mock objects, play them back, and finally verify the results. matchers expected recorded

Apr 03, 2015 Actually this is unfortunate in Java. Matchers have to be called earlier, and stored in a thread local context. Then the actual invocation is done on the mock, and it has to verify that recorded matchers matches the method argument count. If not there is multiple causes. In the above snippet, a matcher is recorded in this line

EasyMock: 1 matchers expected, 2 recorded up vote 11 down vote favorite I am having a problem with EasyMock and JUnit (running through Eclipse). I have read all the similar posts here but have not found an answer. Sep 30, 2008 The N matchers expected, M recorded Problem in EasyMock Posted on September 30, 2008 by Scott Leberknight EasyMock is a Java dynamic mocking framework that allows you to record expected behavior of mock objects, play them back, and finally verify the results.matchers expected recorded Jul 15, 2010  2 matchers expected, 1 recorded. EasyMock is really a nice framework for mocking interfaces, so you can reliably test your classes. As always everything is fine, unless you need to do something more complex. As long as you know all parameters passed to

Rating: 4.42 / Views: 460

Matchers expected recorded free

May 11, 2017 EasyMock is detecting that extra matcher but it is not harmful until the second test. At that point, the number of matchers that EasyMock has recorded but hasn't yet used (2) doesn't line up with the number of parameters expected for the second doXthing call (1). matchers expected recorded Sep 16, 2017 1 Answer 1. active oldest votes. up vote 1 down vote. The problem is you recorded 3 expectations (calls) of your mock but while test executes there was 4 calls of mock's methods. So you've missed one call somewhere. Try to read more your code under test and discover missing call. Or use debugger to discover it. Mar 29, 2007 The message gives a hint, 2 matchers expected, recorded 1. So it lacks a matcher If I now change the code to, it works fine. How can the answer be improved? Apr 11, 2012  Invalid use of argument matchers! 0 matchers expected, 1 recorded. This exception may occur if matchers